Montenegrin Coronavirus Patients’ Identities Exposed Online

After Montenegrin Prime Minister Dusko Markovic announced on Tuesday evening that the country had its first two coronavirus cases, the patients’ identities were published by social media users.

Photos of one of the patients and her family were also posted online.

The ethnicities and religious beliefs of the patients were then targeted with hate-speech comments by some people on social networks.

The Montenegrin Association against AIDS, CAZAS, said that that every patient has the right to privacy and medical confidentiality.

“If you share photos of people who are infected on social networks and spread information about their health, you are directly violating [their] privacy and patient’s rights. There can be legal consequences for doing that,” CAZAS said in a press release.

President of the NGO Civic Alliance, Boris Raonic, warned about the danger of intolerance spreading in country as a result of the coronavirus.

“The stigmatisation of the infected and their families is a great danger in the coming period,” Raonic wrote on Twitter.

The first two coronavirus patients in the country had both recently returned to Montenegro, from Spain and from the US. One patient is from the city of Ulcinj and the other from the capital Podgorica.

Montenegro is a multi-ethnic state and is highly unusual in having no overwhelming community that makes up over half of its population.

About 45 per cent of the population identify as Montenegrins and about 29 per cent as Serbs. Albanians make up about 5 per cent of the population.

Data Collection of Hotel Guests in Hungary Causes Concern

From the beginning of the year, data on all hotel guests staying in Hungary has gone into a central database, drawing concerns from the National Authority for Data Protection and human rights groups about its use and storage. 

The Hungarian Tourism Agency, the MTU, insists that collection of the data is the responsibility of accommodation owners. But many say they are suffering as a result.

“Many of our guests are reluctant to hand over their passports with all their personal data. Despite my telling them that this is a legal obligation, they leave with a bad experience. So they give us bad ratings on booking sites, which depresses our turnover,” a man who runs a small accommodation centre in Budapest told the Magyar Narancs weekly. 

The latest innovation of the government in tourism, the National Tourism Data Supply Centre, NTAK, was launched in mid-2019 and has been fully effective since January 1, 2020. 

The basic idea is to help to develop a tourism strategy and reduce the number of accommodations centres that do not operate in a completely legal way. All those offering accommodation, from big hotels to small Airbnbs, have to report their data on a daily basis. 

Data on income, rooms, reservations and all guests have to be submitted to NTAK. Hotels can use their own software to communicate with it. Smaller service providers use the web-based Az Én Vendégszobám (My Guestroom) system, offered by the MTU free of charge.

While the collection of financial data is widely welcomed in the sector due to the large number of illegal or half-legal guestroom lettings, the collection of personal data raises more questions. 

The programme collects the names of guests, their citizenship, date and place of birth, sex, mother’s name, number of travel documents, zip code and country of residence. There is a possibility of storing emails and phone numbers as well. It is not clear, however, exactly what kind of data is stored and who can access it. While hotels and Airbnb in many countries gather personal data of their guests, it is unusual to have one central database run by the state.

The MTU says the personal data is stored and handled only by the accommodation providers, not by them. However, according to the description of the NTAK, the system stores personal data in encrypted form. In addition, the software offered by MTU is web-based and stores all the data in the central server.

The current law does not specify what data the tourism agency is allowed to collect and states that the MTU can store personal data but not access it.

New legislation will be effective only from September. That will settle many questions, like specifying what data the agency can collect, what has to be encrypted, and more. But the legislation that comes into force in September also allows the police to search the data stored in the data-centre. Also, the agency is sending the data on all third-country guests to the National Directorate General for Aliens Policing. If the personal data was really encrypted, this would be impossible. Magyar Narancs sent several questions to MTÜ before publication, but its reply was only a statement without concrete answers to the queries.

Ádám Ramport, from the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, HCLU, a human rights NGO, argues this could be seen as a pooling data gathering, which is unconstitutional. 

The National Authority for Data Protection also wrote in a statement that the need for this data collection is not well reasoned. It questioned why the Aliens Policing department is allowed to keep the submitted data for five years. The practice is “a further restriction of … the right to the protection of personal data”, the authority summarized.

French Court Rules against Facial Recognition in High Schools

A court in Marseille ruled on Thursday that authorities in France’s southeastern Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur region had no power to authorise the use of facial recognition systems in two high schools in Nice and Marseille.

The city’s Administrative Court overturned the decision of regional authorities, ruling that only schools had the power to authorise such technology.

The court ruled that the decision breached the General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR, as such systems are based on consent but students cannot give consent freely given the relationship of authority that binds them to the school’s administration.

“To my knowledge, this is the first judgment in France concerning the use of facial recognition technologies in public space,” said Alexis Fitzjohn O Cobhthaigh, a lawyer representing several associations that brought the case to court.

Disproportionate measure

The case stems from an experiment launched at the end of 2018 to equip the Ampère high school in Marseille and Les Eucalyptus in Nice with virtual access control devices, by which cameras would recognise high school students and grant them access and be able to follow the trajectory of people.

A number of digital and human rights organisations said the plan violated individual freedoms. France’s National Data Protection Commission, CNIL, also came out against it in October 2019, calling the experiment disproportionate and illegal.

“This installation cannot be implemented legally,” the head of the CNIL wrote to the regional authority in charge of approving the trials, according to a letter cited by the investigative website Mediapart.

According to French media, parents and teachers’ unions also opposed the experiment.

The Administrative Court ruled that using facial recognition to control access to high schools was a disproportionate measure.

Nevertheless, some French media reports said regional authorities were pressing ahead with the plan regardless of the court’s ruling.

Call for total ban

The case was brought in February 2019 by French advocacy group La Quadrature du Net, which works to promote and defend fundamental freedoms in the digital world.

“In France, this is the first court decision about facial recognition and the first success against it! We hope it will be followed by a series of other successes leading to the total ban of facial recognition,” the group wrote on their website on February 27.

La Quadrature du Net and 80 other civil society groups signed a joint letter on December 19 calling on French authorities to ban facial recognition for any purposes of security and surveillance, citing similar bans in San Francisco and other US cities.

“Facial recognition is a uniquely invasive and dehumanising technology, which makes possible, sooner or later, constant surveillance of the public space,” they wrote.

“It creates a society in which we are all suspects. It turns our face into a tracking device, rather than a signifier of personality, eventually reducing it to a technical object. It enables invisible control. It establishes a permanent and inescapable identification regime.”

BIRD Community

Are you a professional journalist or a media worker looking for an easily searchable and comprehensive database and interested in safely (re)connecting with more than thousands of colleagues from Southeastern and Central Europe?

We created BIRD Community, a place where you can have it all!

Join Now